UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Big Game Hunting > big game blood?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Redwood Hounds
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 800

One of the oldest and wisest hunters around these parts told me this....

"If everyone owned Plotts, there'd be a lot more bears in the woods..."

Just thought it was funny. He's a Walker man through and through. He's walked behind many a dog in the bear woods over his years. He's one of the kind thats probably forgotton more than I'll ever know.

I'm not color blind - to each his own - Walkers are my breed of choice. Most of my family runs Plotts. But everyone has at least one Walker - and a few of those "brindle dogs with a tricolor daddy" types, one thing plotts seem to pass down is color .

__________________
Cassandra Davis
UKC Bench Show Judge & Master of Hounds

REDWOOD'S TREEING WALKER COONHOUNDS
& LOUISIANA CATAHOULA LEOPARD DOGS
http://www.RedwoodCoonhounds.net/

NITECH CGRCH FCH GRCH 'PR' Redwood's All Night Aspen
(2014 #1 UKC Top Ten All-Breed Conformation Treeing Walker)
NITECH CCH GRFCH GRWCH GRCH 'PR' Redwood's Wild Gamble

Last edited by Redwood Hounds on 08-16-2007 at 04:57 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-16-2007 04:54 AM
Redwood Hounds is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redwood Hounds Click here to Send Redwood Hounds a Private Message Click Here to Email Redwood Hounds Visit Redwood Hounds's homepage! Find more posts by Redwood Hounds Add Redwood Hounds to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
op27
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: In the Woods
Posts: 17

to a real plott guy--

its not a breed --

its a cult --

Pete, I've been looking for a way to some that up all these years, and this was the best answer I've heard. I'm still laughing, but you are 100% right on the money.

I think they should also be registered.

And to tell one, that his dog's were original breed with Leopard Curs, is like insulting his Sister. DO NOT WANT TO HEAR THAT.

Well enough picking on the diehard plott guy's, to each his own. I've tried quite a few plotts, just haven't found any that suited me. The last one I had, almost made the cut. He was a 1 chromosone short from being a dandie. Had all the tools to make a good one, but had no tree in him at all.

I whole hardly agree with Ladycathunter, if that dog can run a deer all night, that dog has potential. That shows me that it has sticking power. They have the right idea, they just need to fine tuned a little.

I'm all about getting the bear in the air, regardless of what type of dog. I personally like Walkers, and Blues. I like them even better crossed up.





I approve this message

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-16-2007 05:51 AM
op27 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for op27 Click here to Send op27 a Private Message Click Here to Email op27 Find more posts by op27 Add op27 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
M.R.
New UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 9

One thing to remember is that I did not say that plotts were the only dogs that can catch big game; all I said is that they were developed to specifically catch big game, bear to be exact. Plotts too are used on coon and squirrel etc. But their main development was to catch a bear. Good or bad that is for someone else to decide. H.V. Plott and family where bear hunters; Gola Ferguson also was a bear hunter. These people were the ones that developed the plott to what it is. Do they have some leopard cur in them, sure way back there. But they are no more a cur than a walker is Foxhound, if it is that close. Curs were/are developed to be a good all around farm dog. They are what the pioneers needed when starting out on a new homestead, smart and adaptable.

The foxhound may have been very versatile, but it was developed to catch fox and the other animals were a bonus. If it did not help catch fox it was a cull. At the same time, today, it is still a fox hound. As for the Lee Bros. no I don’t know them extensively, but I also have never heard of a Lee hound, I could be wrong and if I am let me know. From what I have gathered, which is not much, is that they used coon hounds and then selected/adapted them to catch the critters that they were after. They became bear and cat dogs with extremely good noses but were developed from, and if you would see a picture of them today be called a red/bluetick or walker, etc.

So what I am saying is that the American developed dogs that the majority of us hunt big game with were not originally intended to hunt big game. They are called coonhounds for a reason. Just as the Foxhound is called a Foxhound for a reason. Like I said before they have been adapted to hunt big game. Chosen for the way that they track, tree, fight, etc. All that is except for the Plott. That does not mean that the plott is better at catching bear than any other breed, it just means that is how they were developed. If you don’t think that a plott is better than a walker then hunt the walker.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-17-2007 04:12 PM
M.R. is offline Click Here to See the Profile for M.R. Click here to Send M.R. a Private Message Find more posts by M.R. Add M.R. to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Kyle W. Graf
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Park Falls, WI.
Posts: 487

M.R.
The foundation dogs of the plott breed were brought to the USA by the Plott family from Germany and they were not bear dogs. They developed them into bear dogs by breeding them to more breeds that were not bear dogs. They finally had bear dogs just like every other breed that was bred for bear hunting.

Do you really think there were enough coon across the USA back then to have breeds that were only used to run coon?
Kyle

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-17-2007 05:31 PM
Kyle W. Graf is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Kyle W. Graf Click here to Send Kyle W. Graf a Private Message Visit Kyle W. Graf's homepage! Find more posts by Kyle W. Graf Add Kyle W. Graf to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bandithunter
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: kellogg mn
Posts: 846

M.R., Lee Bros dogs predate the modern registries. They did the same thing the Plott family did. Bred what worked for them and they were good at it. There are still guys out west looking for any of that blood they can find. Do a little homework on them, you might have to change your opinion on what constitutes a big game dog.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-17-2007 06:00 PM
bandithunter is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bandithunter Click here to Send bandithunter a Private Message Click Here to Email bandithunter Find more posts by bandithunter Add bandithunter to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Melanie H.
UKC Forum Member

Registered: May 2006
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 1344

M.R.

I guess I am failing to see you point on the subject.

Is that just a history lesson?

Are you saying I shouldn't call my Walkers big game dogs because that is not what they were "intended" for a long time ago?

The ones I currently feeding are 5th generation being run on big game.. Hey... that means I have the 6th generation too.. Forgot about those guys....

I think they have past the point of being "coondogs" but if it makes you feel better you can call them that... I just know they aren't coondawgs... but make me happy on cats....

Or are you saying we shouldn't be running them on big game because they are supposed to be coondogs?

Because that would just be silly.. Why would I waste my dogs natural talent and all the **** hard work I have put into them on just a ringtail, when I can be running something that is more fun and rewarding (IMO)

Plotts just don't do it for me.. I think I will stick with my Walker.. what ever they are "supposed" to by hunting, they handle big game fine enough for me

__________________
~Melanie Hampton~
OutWest Big Game Hounds

You've only got 3 choices in life, give in, give up, or give it all you got.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-17-2007 08:26 PM
Melanie H. is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Melanie H. Click here to Send Melanie H. a Private Message Click Here to Email Melanie H. Visit Melanie H.'s homepage! Find more posts by Melanie H. Add Melanie H. to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
M.R.
New UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 9

The original question was:
big game blood?
what type dog do most of you hunt on bear, lion, and bobcat?

long time big game bred hounds? running dog hound mixes? coondog blood?

do you have different types of dogs for trailing and running?

In this I am assuming, maybe wrong, that most people are using dogs that have been developed between 80 to 150 years ago, registered or not. Those would include Plotts, English, Blueticks, Redbones, Walkers, B&T’s and curs of all types. My point was that the only long time big game bred hounds are Plotts. Curs come close but are not a majority big game dogs, they are multi use and not specialized. There is always an exception to the rule. The Lee Bros. was a good example but if you tell someone to get a Lee hound they would ask what is a Lee dog, and if you could explain it you would not be able to find much of it to make any difference. At the same time I am not knocking them but they don’t fit the question. The Lees may have done a similar thing as the Plotts, but their dogs are not recognized as Lee hounds, registered or not. Not all curs are registered but they are still recognized as curs. So no history lesson here just making a statement and providing background. Take it for what is worth I guess. As for calling your Walkers big game or not I never made a comment either way. To go along with your 6 generation example I would put a 20 year span on that. Quite a bit of time for sure. From what you tell me they are big game dogs. What did the seventh generation come from? On the other hand most plott pedigrees don’t stop at the 6 or seventh generation as being big game dogs. You can look at those pedigrees and can trace them 80+ years as being big game dogs. So no I am not telling anyone that they have big game dogs or not, just that the dogs that have been bred the longest for big game and can be recognized for what you call them are the Plotts. All other aforementioned types of dogs either no longer exist or were developed from small game dogs. Neither good nor bad just clarifying what long time means. I am not even telling you that the only dogs that catch game are plotts. Matter of fact I think I stated the totally opposite, “That does not mean that the plott is better at catching bear than any other breed, it just means that is how they were developed. If you don’t think that a plott is better than a walker then hunt the walker.” Its Ol Mander I would suggest if you are looking for big game dogs find what suits you. I hunt long time big game bred dogs.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-17-2007 11:28 PM
M.R. is offline Click Here to See the Profile for M.R. Click here to Send M.R. a Private Message Find more posts by M.R. Add M.R. to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jackbob42
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Oct 2003
Location: mid-michigan
Posts: 4437

If the plotts didn't arrive in America until 1750 , does that mean that nobody bear hunted with hounds before then?
If you think not , how can you prove it?
Does Germany have bears? ( I really don't know )
If not , then they were developed for bear hunting after they got here.
If the fox hounds got here first , how do you know that some guy didn't start hunting and developing his dogs for bear first? And how do you know that they haven't been bred that way for years? Because nobody has claimed that they have? That's not proof.
I could be wrong , but for every person who writes stuff down , there are at least a few who don't. And for every person looking for fame , there are a bunch who don't.
The only thing we know for sure , is the we just don't know for sure. LOL

__________________
Bob Brooks /
Jordan Tyler (grandson)

BackWoods River Walkers/Beagles
Just all 'round , meat gettin' hounds.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-18-2007 01:26 AM
jackbob42 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for jackbob42 Click here to Send jackbob42 a Private Message Find more posts by jackbob42 Add jackbob42 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bandithunter
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: kellogg mn
Posts: 846

Good points Jackbob. I'll use my breed for an example, booticks. French had blue dogs long before the Plott family came to America and I'm prettty sure they didn't use them on coon. There are murals of blue dogs dating from the eleventh century and if Shakespeare is to be believed he referenced dogs from Sparta fitting the description. Pretty sure the Spartans didn't use em on coon either. As for the Lee Bros. stock of dogs, a lot of the guys who have what's left of it couldn't care less about registering them. It's still out there, just gotta know where to look. You need to do a little research on the big game dogs from out west, especially some of the old blood. I think you're being kinda insulting to those who came before you from a lot of the breeds.

Last edited by bandithunter on 08-18-2007 at 02:18 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-18-2007 02:11 PM
bandithunter is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bandithunter Click here to Send bandithunter a Private Message Click Here to Email bandithunter Find more posts by bandithunter Add bandithunter to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Pops
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point NC
Posts: 126

MR
you might want to take another look at the history of the plotts. it was Jonathon Plott that brought them over. Montraville Plott took GREAT offense to his family's dog being called hounds and would readily & rudely inform the offender that they were curs. Jonathon & Mont (and probably many in between) used the same dogs they hunted bear with to work stock.
everyone who thinks we Americans invented treedogs & big game hounds are only fooling themselves. our european relatives used hounds on quite a few big game animals & small game (some of which treed). our less prosperous relatives used curs & cur style dogs to poach big & small game (again some of which treed). there is NOTHING being done w/ dogs that hasn't been done before and in many cases for thousands of years.
for THOUSANDS of years before the advent of firearms, hunting w/ scenthounds, sighthounds, terriers, curs, pointers (& setters), waterdogs & molossers (mastiffs & bulldogs collectively) was the norm, contrary to popular misinformation archery was a minority method generally used by lower classes to poach. then (as now) what a dog ran was up to the guy that owned it, and individual lines were bred for big game.
initially the sighthound & molosser were the types used for big game, the sighthound for faster game like deer, stag & wolf and the molosser for dangerous big game like auroch (wild ancestor to cattle), wisent (european bison), bear (european browns not exactly tree game), boar, lion and wolf.
scenthounds came later when the noblemen turned to small game or desired to make the hunting of big game an extended social event. the vocal nature of scenthounds gave the game early warning and gave a longer run. it also allowed even the least capable riders to maintain contact with the hunt and so partake of the social nature of sport hunting.
by the time scenthounds were developed im the dark ages, the lion, the auroch & the wisent were extinct or nearly so. the primary game of the noblemen using scenthounds was stag, boar, & bear. it was the paid huntsman that used them for wildcats (like lynx), otter, sable, badger & fox to provide furs for his employer. for various reasons some of the noblemens scenthounds were eventually made available to the rising middle class of merchants & tradesmen who used them for game that stayed on smaller parcels like rabbit as they emulated the powerful nobles they envied.
eventually as most big game became less common & hunting took on a social purpose the nobles switched to previously less interesting smaller game like fox, hare & otter. the old big game scenthounds were bred w/ a focus on the smaller game. but then as now not everyone made the switch some continued to focus their individual lines on big game. fox hunting was never as big on the continent as in britain so hounds brought from france by the american colonist were at least as likely to have been run on stag & boar as fox. the germans OTH didn't start getting heavily into scenthounds until the 1700's, they continued primarily w/ hunting molossers. in fact the boar dog of choice until the 1800s was the working dane (more like a dogo argentino than the modern dane).
so M R hounds originated for big game, were switched over then here were switched back.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-22-2007 06:40 AM
Pops is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Pops Click here to Send Pops a Private Message Click Here to Email Pops Find more posts by Pops Add Pops to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BIGCASTLEDAWGS
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 19374

Interesting stuff on here...

... Pops, I was going to mention the sighthounds then I actually read your post(Still sleepy here...LOL)
I love my "retired" racing greyhounds and had them before coonhounds. I will always be a student of sorts and the sighthounds have been something I studied beginning in the 1960's as a child art student at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. Thousands of years ago in art the use of dogs in hunting of big and small game is documented.... I would have Loved to have been involved in the hunting of big game with sighthounds way back when. I'll be thrilled to go big game hunting once in my lifetime. Heck, I'm hoping for one coonhunt again....

I hope everyone can just enjoy their hunting and their hounds or dogs or what ever they choose to hunt with! AND for those of us who just love to learn, keep posting info!

HAPPYHUNTING! and have a good day, Heather

__________________
Home of the BIGCASTLEDAWGS
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i71/BIGCASTLEDAWGS/Websters%20First%20coon/IMG_0045.jpg

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-22-2007 01:09 PM
BIGCASTLEDAWGS is offline Click Here to See the Profile for BIGCASTLEDAWGS Click here to Send BIGCASTLEDAWGS a Private Message Find more posts by BIGCASTLEDAWGS Add BIGCASTLEDAWGS to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bowhunter7
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Elkview, WV
Posts: 134

M.R.

I'm with you on this. The plott was specifically developed for big game. The foundation stock of this entire breed was designed for big game, period. I don't know why you're getting so much flack for stating a fact and I don't know why this would ruffle anyones feathers. I have redbones, plotts, and am getting bluetick this weekend so I have no particular allegiance to one breed. As far as the history lesson there has been a lot of theories on where the plott came from and I don't think any of them are well documented. I know people have researched shipping records and have found nothing supporting the popular story that any dogs came over with Jonathan Plott in 1750 and, furthermore, the Plott family themselves were very tight lipped about what was behind there dogs so the actual origin of these dogs is fuzzy at best. The popular story is that they were developed fron the Sweisshund, but I don't think it has every been proven. My personal belief is that it would have been way to expensive to ship enough dogs over to be a viable breeding foundation for an entire breed. If any dogs did come over from Germany surely they would have been bred to dogs already in this country at some point, but the Plott family kept it pretty quiet. Back to the original issue, the foundation stock of the plott we know today were bear and hog dogs. All of the plotts of today are descendents of either bear or hog dogs. This we know for sure. I don't think this can be said of the other breeds of coonhounds. I love em all, just trying to throw M.R. a life preserver.

Jim

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-22-2007 02:22 PM
bowhunter7 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bowhunter7 Click here to Send bowhunter7 a Private Message Click Here to Email bowhunter7 Find more posts by bowhunter7 Add bowhunter7 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
cab
New UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Buhl, Idaho
Posts: 9

In my big game pack there is some old Lee Brothers blood, walker blood, english, kemmer cur, leopard cur, and bear bred plott cur, not Brandenburger coonhound stock from the 70's. There are plotts that have been bred from bear dog stock for 45-50 years and there are as different from the coondog stock as redbones are from black & tans. There are walkers that carry lots of running blood, and there are walkers that are almost pure english. A bear dog is where you find him. All breeds produce a few bear dogs, (most don't know the difference between a bear dog and a dog that will run bear) But 60+ years of big game dogs has IMO shown that the greatest percent of top notch bear dogs will be found among the bear bred plotts and not among coondog bred hounds. Not saying there aren't good bear dogs outside the bear bred plotts, I'm talking percentages. If you look for lion dogs, bobcat dogs, hog dogs, combination dogs, that is a different ball game.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-22-2007 04:48 PM
cab is offline Click Here to See the Profile for cab Click here to Send cab a Private Message Click Here to Email cab Find more posts by cab Add cab to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Pops
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point NC
Posts: 126

Heather
if you have or decide to get sighthounds you can run them on deer down south and fox pretty much everywhere.
i have a friend in SC that takes several deer & fox every year. he has a nice bob full mount that a pair of his stretched.
but the main game of sighthounds here is coyote & jackrabbit.

everybody else keeps missing the point that scenthounds were originally developed for big game & some lines were maintained that way even after being imported to america. but later were incorporated into a "breed" the grande bleu gascon being a perfect example. they never stopped bing used for big game in france and were used here for big & small game. then some yahoo got them registered as english then bluetick and only lately w/ new imports & remaining old type are they starting to be separated.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 04:04 AM
Pops is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Pops Click here to Send Pops a Private Message Click Here to Email Pops Find more posts by Pops Add Pops to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
BIGCASTLEDAWGS
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 19374

Morning Pops

quote:
Originally posted by Pops
Heather
if you have or decide to get sighthounds you can run them on deer down south and fox pretty much everywhere.
i have a friend in SC that takes several deer & fox every year. he has a nice bob full mount that a pair of his stretched.
but the main game of sighthounds here is coyote & jackrabbit.

everybody else keeps missing the point that scenthounds were originally developed for big game & some lines were maintained that way even after being imported to america. but later were incorporated into a "breed" the grande bleu gascon being a perfect example. they never stopped bing used for big game in france and were used here for big & small game. then some yahoo got them registered as english then bluetick and only lately w/ new imports & remaining old type are they starting to be separated.



My Dawgs here at home,retired NGA Greyhound,Bluetick and a BnT are "just pets".Nothing round here to run and no land The NGA dogs have no skin...a thorn is Big Game and requires hosp. visit LOL... My old guy would love to hunt...but he'd have died way long ago! The BnT is an AKC....showdog variety and my blue is retired. I own half a Blue female in WI who is turning out to be a nice coondog and I looke forward to following her sometime if health allows. I have a dream to go big game hunting at least once... and I would LOVE to see sighthounds at work one time! It would be a real dream come true!
The history is really intersting to me. Of course breeds were developed and changed etc... if you look at the differences in prey and terrain you can see WHY the changes occured. Most of us dont have to hunt for food any more or to protect our families.... but when you look back at our ancestors it makes so much sense.
Keep posting the history it is cool!
By the way...LOL... Our AKC BnT is pictured with his owner, our son Dylan, in a Dutch Mag. In the article they have to explain what Raccoons are and why they are hunted In other countries the Coonhounds and other dogs are still used for big game and raccoons dont even exist.... fascinating stuff.
Get out there and run your dogs, enjoy nature as much as you can! Around here(we're between Boston and Providence) we can only dream about this stuff and follow it online. When you all post your pix and stories you have NO idea how it can brighten someone elses day!
Thanks again, HappyHunting! Heather

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 12:37 PM
BIGCASTLEDAWGS is offline Click Here to See the Profile for BIGCASTLEDAWGS Click here to Send BIGCASTLEDAWGS a Private Message Find more posts by BIGCASTLEDAWGS Add BIGCASTLEDAWGS to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
cab
New UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Buhl, Idaho
Posts: 9

I think we make a mistake by lumping everything that runs and hunts a species of animal classed as "big game", as big game dogs". Most dogs have one species that they prefer and excell on that species alone. A lion dog will likely run a bear, but that doesn't make him a "bear dog". A bear dog will run a bobcat, but will usually never make a real "cat dog". Most big game dogs will make the switch to coon, but will seldom become a top cooner.
The original Plott family and the Lee Brothers have passed and gone. The dogs we call Plotts and Lee Brothers stock are long since removed from any of the old stock that they hunted with and were bred by men who may not have a clue as to what the goal of the original breeding plan was. I have have had, and still have a little of each in the kennel today. The Plotts and Lee Brothers, would probably cull my entire pack but this is what I have seen, just my experience with the two. For felines, the Lee Brothers stock are better that MOST of the plotts, but not all of them. On bear, the Plotts are much better for me, more grit and track speed but SOME times this isn't always true either. If hog hunting is the "main" game then I would go with the cur breeds. If I had to pick one breed as a big game dog, it would have to be the bear bred plott.
My point is, When saying "big game" dogs, concider what game we have in mind and plan to target.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 05:09 PM
cab is offline Click Here to See the Profile for cab Click here to Send cab a Private Message Click Here to Email cab Find more posts by cab Add cab to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
hellcat
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1522

Good Posts Everyone !!!

Well thought out-Well written.
Jess

__________________
Jess
Light Foot English

"They are often imitated but never duplicated"

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 05:22 PM
hellcat is offline Click Here to See the Profile for hellcat Click here to Send hellcat a Private Message Click Here to Email hellcat Visit hellcat's homepage! Find more posts by hellcat Add hellcat to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bandithunter
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: kellogg mn
Posts: 846

I'm inclined to agree with Cab when he speaks about " big game dogs" cause that covers a lot of ground. A Plott is his element can be hard to beat on bear, whether down south or even up here where I live. Take that same dog to the desert southwest and run him with some good dry ground dogs and I'll bet ya a steak dinner he won't look too good. Ya might get away with saying Plotts make the best bear dogs but I doubt they're the best on dry ground lions. Might depend on what ya call big game.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 06:40 PM
bandithunter is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bandithunter Click here to Send bandithunter a Private Message Click Here to Email bandithunter Find more posts by bandithunter Add bandithunter to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bowhunter7
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Elkview, WV
Posts: 134

quote:
Originally posted by Pops
MR
everyone who thinks we Americans invented treedogs & big game hounds are only fooling themselves.



I've been chewing on this for a few days realizing it needed a response but not really sure how to respond until now. I agree Americans did not invent treedogs, but we did invent the 6 "coonhound" breeds we are discussing here. These dogs we hunt today in this country are very distinct from their English and European ancestors. Not completely genetically isolated from them, but a different breed for sure. Dogs were brought over during dawn of this country, but the earliest designation of a recognized treehound breed in America was the Black and Tan in, I believe, 1900. So, that gives us at least 150 to 200 years of genetic molesting before any sort of breed standard was set. Before that who knows what was going on as far as breeding. I'd be willing to bet the pioneers were more concerned with performance than "pure" bloodlines. And this genetic tinkering has given us what we hunt today, breeds very different from what was brought to this country from England/Europe.

Jim

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-23-2007 07:59 PM
bowhunter7 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for bowhunter7 Click here to Send bowhunter7 a Private Message Click Here to Email bowhunter7 Find more posts by bowhunter7 Add bowhunter7 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
cab
New UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Buhl, Idaho
Posts: 9

but we did invent the 6 "coonhound" breeds we are discussing here. These dogs we hunt today in this country are very distinct from their English and European ancestors.

The plotts most hunters know today, is diferent from the plotts of the 1950's. It doesn't take much research to find out about the changes that took place within the breed in the 60's and 70's. Who brought in the "new" blood and why. I have owned the old bear bred UKC reg. plotts, and I have owned the modern coondog bred UKC reg. plotts. They are two different types of dogs in appearance and hunting ability.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 08-27-2007 04:56 AM
cab is offline Click Here to See the Profile for cab Click here to Send cab a Private Message Click Here to Email cab Find more posts by cab Add cab to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)